FDA, EMA Adopt 10 Shared Principles for AI Drug Development

Serge Bulaev

Serge Bulaev

The FDA and EMA have agreed on 10 clear rules for using AI in drug development, making sure patient safety comes first while helping new medicines reach people faster. These rules cover every step in a drug's journey, from discovery to after it's on the market, and focus on things like ethics, teamwork, and keeping track of every change. Companies must now keep records about their AI models, check their work for risks, and prove their safety. This new system has already helped create new drugs more quickly and could make drug development safer and more efficient across the US and Europe. While following these rules might be hard and costly, the hope is it will lead to bigger, better trials and fewer mistakes down the road.

FDA, EMA Adopt 10 Shared Principles for AI Drug Development

The FDA and EMA have adopted 10 shared principles for AI in drug development, establishing a unified framework to guide the use of algorithms across the pharmaceutical industry. This landmark agreement aims to ensure patient safety while accelerating the delivery of innovative medicines by providing clear standards for discovery, clinical trials, and post-market surveillance.

This foundational document serves as the backbone for future technical guidances, aligning the U.S. and E.U. on how the industry must validate, monitor, and document every AI system.

What the document covers

The ten principles apply to all stages of a medicine's lifecycle, from initial discovery and preclinical studies to clinical trials, manufacturing, and post-market monitoring. They build upon existing Good Practice (GxP) standards, emphasizing traceability, robust documentation, and a risk-based approach to oversight and validation.

These harmonized rules carry significant operational weight. According to the European Medicines Agency's official release and the FDA's page on Guiding Principles of Good AI Practice, companies are now required to document data provenance, define the context of use, and implement risk-based performance checks throughout each model's lifecycle.

Four pillars that stand out

  • Human-centric design: Ensuring every AI model respects fundamental ethical and societal values.
  • Risk-based approach: Scaling validation and oversight in proportion to the model's potential clinical impact.
  • Multidisciplinary expertise: Fostering collaboration between data scientists, clinicians, and regulatory experts.
  • Life-cycle management: Implementing continuous monitoring, version control, and post-deployment auditing for all models.

Market impact in numbers

The new principles arrive as investment in the sector skyrockets. Venture financing for AI in pharma surged by over 400 percent from 2014 to 2024 as the industry anticipated regulatory clarity. Projections estimate the AI drug discovery market will reach approximately $2.6 billion in 2025, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) forecasted between 26% and 31% through 2030.

Pioneering Examples Aligned with New Principles

  1. Insilico Medicine: Its AI-designed drug for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, rentosertib, advanced to Phase 2a in 2025, showing positive signals in lung function.
  2. World Economic Forum: A collaborative project successfully used machine learning to identify five gene targets for kidney fibrosis in less than a year, subsequently confirming them in organoid models.
  3. Exscientia: The company reduced the design-to-clinic timeline for a novel cancer molecule to just one year, demonstrating how integrated, multidisciplinary teams can effectively meet the new lifecycle and documentation standards.

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance

Adhering to these principles will require investment. Establishing cross-functional governance boards, creating new validation datasets, and implementing robust version control pipelines will add to operational costs. However, as European Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi notes, the expected payoff includes larger, more efficient transatlantic trials and a reduction in late-stage drug failures. For pharmaceutical companies facing patent expirations, the trade-off - stricter documentation for faster, safer innovation - is a compelling value proposition.